{"id":"W2084571232","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00122.x","title":"Alternative Methods of Appellate Review in Trade Remedy Cases: Examining Results of U.S. Judicial and NAFTA Binational Review of U.S. Agency Decisions from 1989 to 2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Free trade agreement; Political science; Law; Settlement (finance); Judicial review; Dispute resolution; Standard of review; Law and economics; Economics; Free trade; International trade; Sociology; Payment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003372755,0.00014323,0.001111132,0.0002173315,0.0001323061,0.000005225887,0.0002870175,0.00005216053,0.00006522614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02248207,0.0001140787,0.0001286636,0.00124252,0.0004875279,0.0002325828,0.0001029103,0.0002235893,9.224494e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001211321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000347302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005221581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004567133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958062,0.0009810743,0.001898063,0.0001984748,0.0009278484,0.0001883612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946682,0.003098418,0.001296965,0.0001237735,0.0006695403,0.000143095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002077043,0.005019472,0.09575823,0.01117267,0.0043927,0.002126153,0.2086084,0.0004475197,0.006157218,0.02399241,0.4391987,0.2010495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004563469,0.001824173,0.3696205,0.1195927,0.0009608384,0.0001888298,0.003673278,0.00001712892,0.003209988,0.004823532,0.4906003,0.0009253437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1691027,0.7336757,0.0007494296,0.08998587,0.0007381963,0.001054592,0.0001838458,0.00001272442,0.004496918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4903525,0.4927597,0.01571868,0.000919246,0.0001862395,0.000002285509,0.000002128517,0.0000102673,0.00004889046],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2384257796983763,"score_gpt":0.4881777595488758,"score_spread":0.2497519798504996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}