{"id":"W2084583462","doi":"10.1002/atr.188","title":"Random regret minimization or random utility maximization: an exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Regret; Context (archaeology); Minification; Utility maximization; Maximization; Computer science; Exploratory analysis; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Econometrics; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Machine learning; Data science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001071043,0.0001088405,0.0004735868,0.0002959211,0.0000366949,0.00001068104,0.0001666573,0.0000672659,0.0005411856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006730652,0.00009058614,0.0002036931,0.0004217353,0.00005364935,0.001059209,0.000001616356,0.0001059617,0.000004077669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005616014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002324965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005299209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008242989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982779,0.00007589216,0.001301609,0.0001718547,0.00007156334,0.0001011763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982633,0.0001021124,0.001345361,0.0001896576,0.00005920335,0.00004039578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002562399,0.0005568697,0.8791469,0.00005430888,0.0003051869,0.000006595943,0.0419515,0.07092863,0.00004073361,0.001375421,0.0000207764,0.003050666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006156862,0.0002100937,0.9827854,0.00001485499,0.0001558126,0.000001338725,0.005485341,0.002976433,0.0001160951,0.001737714,0.0002485717,0.0001114957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632726,0.0005490982,0.03540519,0.00004853067,0.0001632985,0.0002598383,0.00005708473,0.000005094803,0.0002392441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964114,0.0005718232,0.002760297,0.00007848363,0.00003173442,0.00001583393,0.0001034354,0.00001009166,0.00001692306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1036385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08020964197159035,"score_gpt":0.2427933876032794,"score_spread":0.162583745631689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}