{"id":"W2084677554","doi":"10.1068/a33128","title":"Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Property tax; Property value; Politics; Property (philosophy); Location; Public economics; Inequality; Public finance; Economics; Geography; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Tax reform; Political science; Finance; Law; Real estate","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639318,0.0003664559,0.001402193,0.003856105,0.0003415633,0.001270418,0.0006090149,0.0009208996,0.0014726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003032047,0.0002967771,0.0004839794,0.009405061,0.0006932925,0.001313484,0.0004619386,0.0005077532,0.0003976245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001281222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007359075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01289925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.0002992195,0.0001191942,0.00008141735,0.0002263997,0.00003832578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976934,0.001662216,0.0002692102,0.00003349958,0.0003078089,0.0000338567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001116033,0.0001442323,0.005714229,0.04144438,0.0002424244,0.001371974,0.001209029,0.0005610604,0.0002514551,0.005292616,0.02139834,0.9222586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004768001,0.0005765291,0.06284512,0.07165913,0.001390299,0.01321603,0.005813155,0.0005208074,0.0005838766,0.00370121,0.8395569,0.00008919954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001552047,0.997085,0.00006659993,0.0002662163,0.0000276918,0.000009447661,0.00002356023,0.000001822849,0.0009676177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005909567,0.9937682,0.00008203925,0.00007547927,0.00002604974,0.000008603212,0.00002202809,6.037322e-7,0.0001074446],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007359075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01463252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07732078443064573,"score_gpt":0.267883227461884,"score_spread":0.1905624430312383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}