{"id":"W2084677554","doi":"10.1068/a33128","title":"Social and Geographic Inequities in the Residential Property Tax: A Review and Case Study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Property tax; Property value; Politics; Property (philosophy); Location; Public economics; Inequality; Public finance; Economics; Geography; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Tax reform; Political science; Finance; Law; Real estate","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001432775,0.0003807037,0.001476293,0.0002258324,0.0003495098,0.0002764584,0.0001093272,0.0001785035,0.00004539669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001855848,0.0002924055,0.00008390849,0.00007848939,0.0001849598,0.0002001239,0.0001701037,0.0003777324,0.000007805072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003391254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001247106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006653885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001369235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982351,0.0001156787,0.0007067853,0.0006312488,0.00001931991,0.0002918813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991701,0.0001386722,0.0004171304,0.000199526,0.000001724417,0.00007282245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005265142,0.0004500859,0.3049594,0.0376301,0.0009886107,0.002749242,0.03055309,0.000005326323,6.574918e-9,0.003002538,0.004252512,0.6153564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004133729,0.0001011471,0.0008840369,0.001041316,0.000296987,0.0009171407,0.002297946,0.00002980995,1.276764e-9,0.000413667,0.9931239,0.0004807135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01949069,0.974666,0.000004317902,0.0003456956,0.00003891122,0.001030828,0.00003256425,0.000008737807,0.004382228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009925134,0.9891382,0.00002065601,0.0001410606,0.0001378492,0.0001355564,0.0000152946,0.00002727305,0.0004589012],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07732078443064573,"score_gpt":0.267883227461884,"score_spread":0.1905624430312383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}