{"id":"W2084695480","doi":"10.1080/02522667.2012.10700146","title":"Approaching the best while avoiding the worst option: Consumer choice modeling via TOPSIS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Similarity (geometry); Ideal (ethics); Computer science; Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Marketing; Contrast (vision); Operations research; Mathematics; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858887,0.0008277585,0.0008376904,0.001365082,0.00107053,0.002661272,0.001246871,0.001460424,0.004872087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005736324,0.0004717705,0.001167396,0.002392208,0.001148822,0.001541203,0.001510328,0.001503813,0.0002246964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002039391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001606706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007236076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969825,0.002130391,0.00009928758,0.0002107036,0.0004293187,0.0001477965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961113,0.003171488,0.0002314864,0.0000895727,0.0002861189,0.0001099841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000162745,0.0002011688,0.005792376,0.0002195984,0.0002718135,0.0003379418,0.001404278,0.8785297,0.0009623355,0.07740103,0.00100747,0.03370944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001177798,0.00006722046,0.0004365272,0.00002415756,0.00002149891,0.00002092117,0.0002554755,0.9794495,0.0001062319,0.01920839,0.0003807266,0.00001764841],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2665958,0.00033632,0.7192987,0.001309138,0.00004853715,0.0003584271,0.000199459,0.0001134711,0.01174014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179015,0.0002205657,0.07991266,0.00005044412,0.00001218165,0.0002850157,0.00008167464,0.0000102337,0.001525832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009395044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02040803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06443764092296299,"score_gpt":0.2715539619179331,"score_spread":0.2071163209949701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}