{"id":"W2084701419","doi":"10.1115/es2010-90395","title":"Resource Accounting and Waste Impact: Limitations of Exergy as a Sustainability Tool","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Volume 1","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Exergy; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Environmental economics; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Management science; Process engineering; Engineering; Business; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092121,0.000463663,0.0004240648,0.00018975,0.000294671,0.0001743647,0.000837229,0.0002946114,0.004198206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003872731,0.0004362381,0.0002316772,0.0003375372,0.001641264,0.0009224385,0.0009272799,0.0006257693,0.00003193452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001428514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003719846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008954753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001171836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964694,0.0002060058,0.000742363,0.000924993,0.0009162306,0.0007409405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975163,0.0003495805,0.0003637543,0.0009713935,0.0004664231,0.0003325581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007109143,0.001704214,0.7403919,0.0001102601,0.0001310859,0.0000430182,0.002449012,0.00422824,0.006783187,0.1124503,0.002077442,0.1289204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111165,0.00101607,0.7068403,0.00002522585,0.00006114566,0.00005208775,0.01562452,0.02282447,0.00228963,0.2055848,0.04343427,0.001135884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666806,0.000008149957,0.0002724671,0.004567249,0.0002489405,0.0004460774,0.00003481035,0.00006445127,0.02767727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867418,0.00002481942,0.000277563,0.0002461558,0.00009421394,0.0001027184,0.00005062796,0.00003830802,0.01242375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1277846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01666044219852108,"score_gpt":0.2724655657692269,"score_spread":0.2558051235707058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}