{"id":"W2084701419","doi":"10.1115/es2010-90395","title":"Resource Accounting and Waste Impact: Limitations of Exergy as a Sustainability Tool","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Volume 1","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Exergy; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Environmental economics; Process (computing); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Management science; Process engineering; Engineering; Business; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01216795,0.001492517,0.002225689,0.005827684,0.001548689,0.01392402,0.004822174,0.002565166,0.0033424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03763268,0.0007061418,0.001497336,0.008472947,0.009830742,0.01502323,0.006956558,0.003960949,0.0008984096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004105714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005408711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006897721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006514458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860334,0.005755055,0.0009978965,0.0007639887,0.005897025,0.0005525854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735136,0.01805781,0.001317607,0.002572805,0.004209837,0.0003283946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004123666,0.00006374427,0.002136981,0.0005409723,0.00005694063,0.00008138413,0.000560005,0.01567918,0.0002299623,0.8642609,0.003033683,0.113315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001441907,0.00007430044,0.002301486,0.00105046,0.00005947824,0.000197852,0.002060799,0.04155852,0.001587461,0.8887048,0.06228015,0.0001102358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0571871,0.03973994,0.6629516,0.04065091,0.00149941,0.0003518083,0.0006425473,0.0007705951,0.196206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499361,0.01632909,0.1167684,0.002215449,0.0007246982,0.0002951797,0.0001597717,0.0003368959,0.01323437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01392402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06435102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01666044219852108,"score_gpt":0.2724655657692269,"score_spread":0.2558051235707058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}