{"id":"W2084725398","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00337.x","title":"An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Sustainability; Industrial ecology; Compromise; Work (physics); Environmental economics; Scale (ratio); Value (mathematics); Economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Production (economics); Ecology; Computer science; Sociology; Microeconomics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002923751,0.00006759038,0.000238726,0.00009631363,0.00004498962,0.00000978655,0.000343984,0.0002236298,0.004798331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008740799,0.00004679756,0.00007227984,0.0001170196,0.0004947821,0.00092114,0.0001882383,0.000552844,0.000005010108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008087023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002178458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007535063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004781967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978233,0.0009261755,0.0007567712,0.00007255115,0.0002084234,0.0002127611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989522,0.0002990157,0.0004379964,0.0001809619,0.00002333615,0.0001065583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003065335,0.000646299,0.9890676,0.00000365611,0.0000103695,0.000004118349,0.0004572191,0.005301272,0.0001970772,0.0001124283,0.001764739,0.002128761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007603674,0.001143075,0.9944044,0.00000587691,0.000006073645,0.000008810966,0.000836749,0.0008617526,0.000528487,0.0008474217,0.0005535801,0.00004341615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973309,8.908827e-7,0.000007472626,0.0003361653,0.0001890306,0.0002405373,0.000006502007,0.000001002412,0.001887468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994614,0.0000123596,0.0003747204,0.00009886108,0.00003125946,0.000003603757,4.511756e-7,0.000002799412,0.0000145057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005336863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1156887189759011,"score_gpt":0.3508061249986008,"score_spread":0.2351174060226998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}