{"id":"W2084870470","doi":"10.1108/13598541011039947","title":"Performance assessment framework for supply chain partnership","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supply Chain Management An International Journal","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Process management; Supply chain; Flexibility (engineering); Supply chain management; Quality (philosophy); Knowledge management; Computer science; Operational excellence; Originality; Performance measurement; Business; Marketing; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003094188,0.0004716459,0.0003526126,0.001031215,0.0007143656,0.002292195,0.002111855,0.0001747948,0.003136149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001300352,0.0004594116,0.0003162607,0.0003601281,0.0001402259,0.003203302,0.0005246013,0.00094019,0.0002489079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001497864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004638521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004770874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001069966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996146,0.00004947628,0.0008537821,0.000658414,0.001447883,0.0008444995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980971,0.0001242473,0.0005605513,0.0005888127,0.0005273766,0.0001019406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002645987,0.0004847317,0.0678341,0.0002057762,0.0004230677,0.00009161443,0.0001673334,0.0005253587,0.00007357066,0.8660166,0.01591418,0.04799904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002851686,0.0001234156,0.1094147,0.0002180435,0.0001964839,0.00003124053,0.001625623,0.04661154,0.00003534836,0.1245748,0.7133222,0.0009948863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6771969,0.00003925012,0.1386775,0.04310762,0.01953369,0.003232368,0.00006167299,0.0006575496,0.1174935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95129,0.0001125117,0.02790847,0.007009125,0.009878615,0.0002706272,0.0003753561,0.00008805786,0.003067279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02759810696507519,"score_gpt":0.3122650800610356,"score_spread":0.2846669730959605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}