{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004668884,0.0001210776,0.0001711739,0.0003873973,0.0004510037,0.0007407045,0.002050151,0.00005935156,0.00007866348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002098853,0.00005977058,0.00006319647,0.0004355764,0.0003140488,0.0009381112,0.0000796013,0.000303045,0.000003547445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004093134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009019488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.148508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5165382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970645,0.0003606207,0.0004889722,0.0001867729,0.001634447,0.0002647208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979748,0.0008061993,0.0002785576,0.0001837843,0.0006416969,0.0001149603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001509628,0.0007662597,0.3836348,0.00004724244,0.0001472883,0.0005312892,0.3310824,0.001284177,0.001035012,0.05493966,0.06685647,0.1581658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002541,0.0009267733,0.8553128,0.004808109,0.0001073632,0.0009500736,0.05130632,0.0001157262,0.0006602264,0.04476157,0.0391934,0.0008551516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292521,0.002471902,0.0001973857,0.0627514,0.0003910341,0.0003202189,0.000004040817,0.00001157468,0.004600336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942497,0.00007640685,0.0007852088,0.001071929,0.0005990216,0.00001716928,3.092872e-7,0.000008384406,0.00319189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.471678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.221372687988687,"score_gpt":0.4527667752722754,"score_spread":0.2313940872835884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}