{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06531967,0.0007707645,0.001785213,0.0102925,0.02729552,0.03168588,0.008357217,0.01476619,0.005802931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1277928,0.00108396,0.001216788,0.01479194,0.0614366,0.01573972,0.008819146,0.02496948,0.0005480406],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1893866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2538593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9139148,0.0200765,0.003036879,0.008063138,0.04437336,0.0105353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8686313,0.06061663,0.003641439,0.004737683,0.05234201,0.01003092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006499104,0.00002987289,0.002068921,0.0004005446,0.00004022192,0.0002213442,0.01094273,0.0002194458,0.0001542455,0.8979763,0.0419784,0.04590302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107538,0.00006055782,0.01129324,0.002507052,0.0001357084,0.0004499964,0.02050495,0.001369058,0.0004642671,0.3758666,0.586819,0.0004221068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007712788,0.04251327,0.005498633,0.8583188,0.001389424,0.00004435716,0.0002066857,0.00005438828,0.08426165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5684222,0.07325331,0.01783391,0.3125016,0.003060964,0.0001736658,0.0002788908,0.0001898023,0.02428567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1893866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.221372687988687,"score_gpt":0.4527667752722754,"score_spread":0.2313940872835884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}