{"id":"W2085100441","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.262","title":"COST-ANALYSIS OF TAVI: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Checklist; Context (archaeology); Systematic review; Cost effectiveness; MEDLINE; Economic evaluation; Cost–benefit analysis; Stenosis; Meta-analysis; Aortic valve replacement; Surgery; Internal medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006691561,0.001893967,0.01106607,0.006015331,0.000410444,0.00249754,0.001958318,0.001824237,0.006333224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03543994,0.001295337,0.01549782,0.007967545,0.0005997096,0.001946892,0.001564789,0.002122776,0.0002646031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004284669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006022326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01144107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0376555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991847,0.003431997,0.002550669,0.0005324558,0.001362379,0.0002755577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980036,0.01492199,0.003334207,0.0002963623,0.001206467,0.00020497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00129809,0.00004504461,0.002080513,0.8413532,0.1179421,0.0001419926,0.00007105555,0.0004402988,0.0001298209,0.0002815785,0.001836172,0.03438006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001993991,0.0004146448,0.0100893,0.2731566,0.7013304,0.0005433015,0.0002298074,0.0004670256,0.0001628845,0.0007579421,0.01077314,0.00008107233],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001583272,0.9970533,0.0001712713,0.0002233177,0.0001093059,0.0001368778,0.0005281132,0.000006720094,0.000187843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04829375,0.9489149,0.001171854,0.0006763913,0.0001386214,0.0002772153,0.0003903815,0.00001017241,0.0001267313],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01144107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03538877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05517328924327785,"score_gpt":0.404559160110838,"score_spread":0.3493858708675602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}