{"id":"W2085221286","doi":"10.2172/807134","title":"2001 Evaluation of Tritium Removal & Mitigation Technologies for Waste Water Treatment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hanford Site; Environmental science; Groundwater; Tritium; Effluent; Waste management; Savannah River Site; Glovebox; Radioactive waste; Remedial action; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Environmental remediation; Contamination; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347415,0.0005223259,0.000350317,0.0009958494,0.0007684192,0.001072866,0.0007002201,0.000735807,0.002385478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009533,0.0001993821,0.0004025038,0.0007511384,0.0002432187,0.0006470661,0.0003201985,0.0004338454,0.0005711248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002456235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001193852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003426313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006705229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980733,0.0005136903,0.00006749952,0.000125153,0.001120526,0.00009980321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.0001094472,0.0001329809,0.00002463745,0.0003167691,0.00003259987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002745252,0.001258848,0.01327018,0.002519529,0.000224113,0.0004568241,0.0004251644,0.01749567,0.4778664,0.002337131,0.005472213,0.4759286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001611461,0.006660395,0.0252127,0.0001230665,0.0002282335,0.0004005049,0.000345692,0.00647404,0.8936196,0.0004106547,0.06632068,0.00004328661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145877,0.01191929,0.01467867,0.00124275,0.0001424736,0.0009813753,0.001081338,0.0003071141,0.05505925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547033,0.007428896,0.01275623,0.0003539208,0.00003529872,0.0003880038,0.001155941,0.00003221568,0.02314629],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003426313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01782131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09195488170034057,"score_gpt":0.3252861008802266,"score_spread":0.2333312191798861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}