{"id":"W2085303147","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.06.005","title":"Improving evidential argumentation through statistical sampling: evaluating the effects of a classroom intervention for at-risk 7th-graders","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Mathematical Behavior","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Argumentation theory; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Newspaper; Sampling (signal processing); Point (geometry); Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004598552,0.0001736354,0.0004139183,0.00005829069,0.0002389149,0.00004404658,0.0003388852,0.0000766407,0.00008586254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02684806,0.00009637853,0.0002498163,0.0001021108,0.0002283863,0.000119418,0.0000768883,0.0003042107,0.000005746337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001793493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001039177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001795784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005224671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971957,0.0006760554,0.001173778,0.0001184689,0.000603008,0.000232959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789068,0.01888577,0.001548538,0.000267589,0.0003329267,0.00005838617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003396499,0.006766421,0.0007888149,0.01040861,0.0012194,0.00001886511,0.06842841,0.0004038606,0.1792632,0.5493715,0.00351389,0.1764205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003090142,0.001890562,0.001381458,0.0006427218,0.003743824,0.0001506663,0.005494653,0.0003918831,0.03021556,0.9528183,0.0000132139,0.0001670303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.410277,0.00009960471,0.5883489,0.0001643848,0.0004269723,0.0006473704,0.000020701,0.000009597378,0.000005507196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3357387,0.00004264535,0.6638489,0.00003307267,0.0001324111,0.00008670954,0.000004343835,0.00003224617,0.00008097795],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4034468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2578658195853872,"score_gpt":0.5077175293939203,"score_spread":0.2498517098085331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}