{"id":"W2085303147","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.06.005","title":"Improving evidential argumentation through statistical sampling: evaluating the effects of a classroom intervention for at-risk 7th-graders","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Mathematical Behavior","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Argumentation theory; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Mathematics education; Newspaper; Sampling (signal processing); Point (geometry); Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005074774,0.001077067,0.001629428,0.0008645597,0.001089463,0.001019315,0.002146119,0.001556276,0.003683069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03297287,0.0006691056,0.0008074066,0.0003900221,0.0008169548,0.0008013857,0.001380172,0.001896295,0.0005426379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006833086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002164562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002904563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964568,0.001686501,0.0003622777,0.0005480694,0.0006446004,0.000301665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766794,0.0146087,0.00291402,0.001368476,0.0008544634,0.003574853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04912614,0.5082808,0.02162634,0.002396999,0.0007752488,0.0005649721,0.01266837,0.004001867,0.01275032,0.001270468,0.002441438,0.384097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0779862,0.617603,0.2072398,0.001519251,0.004341078,0.000837444,0.008721068,0.03891268,0.0290406,0.00628608,0.007119502,0.0003932395],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982435,0.00006429457,0.0007261785,0.0001376097,0.00003048061,0.0003280251,0.00001913622,0.00008225911,0.0003686316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869359,0.000241352,0.01068337,0.0001081407,0.00004108495,0.0009415355,0.00007123806,0.00001561029,0.0009618514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005074774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02683824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2578658195853872,"score_gpt":0.5077175293939203,"score_spread":0.2498517098085331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}