{"id":"W2085304430","doi":"10.4141/cjps08104","title":"Yield and quality responses of irrigated timothy to fertilizer application in southern Alberta","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"Alberta Crop Industry Development Fund","keywords":"Phleum; Human fertilization; Fertilizer; Agronomy; Dry matter; Hay; Urea; Yield (engineering); Ammonium nitrate; Animal science; Irrigation; Crop; Nitrate; Phosphorus; Chemistry; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009418451,0.00004493444,0.0001141978,0.00005540864,0.00007119876,0.00004344235,0.0002530454,0.00002608258,0.00002407268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004068544,0.00001886431,0.0000179309,0.0002641517,0.00008020242,0.0001601144,0.000006676351,0.00006271448,0.000004747063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000348958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001122578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1336533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3255297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999354,0.00003356654,0.000261976,0.0001035656,0.00009946473,0.0001474455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993168,0.0001663484,0.0001667906,0.00003369833,0.00006123195,0.0002552024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670441,0.00001657987,0.06813417,0.000002940496,0.000002941893,0.000005618127,0.002223299,0.00001586295,0.9148964,0.0004229139,0.0001972408,0.01391499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006591625,0.0003086258,0.990993,0.000107585,0.000002992382,0.00004655577,0.001750016,0.00008273338,0.002534616,0.0001147772,0.003901189,0.00009205179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970267,0.00005864359,0.000006942887,0.002291707,0.00004381319,0.00006148334,0.00003313834,9.013455e-7,0.0004766884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995494,0.000001814774,0.00002494445,0.0002616881,0.00002516301,3.20633e-7,7.025599e-7,1.760199e-7,0.0001357689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8721158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04300462828781915,"score_gpt":0.2578100005596712,"score_spread":0.214805372271852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}