{"id":"W2085411249","doi":"10.1167/10.7.526","title":"Second-order saliency predicts observer eye movements when viewing natural images","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Salience (neuroscience); Eye movement; Fixation (population genetics); Luminance; Computer science; Observer (physics); Natural (archaeology); Salient; Filter (signal processing); Scene statistics; Saccadic masking; Eye tracking; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology; Perception; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002843113,0.0002162051,0.0001982409,0.0002544326,0.00008216796,0.0003389425,0.00009768373,0.0002986883,0.0008196434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002513544,0.000233314,0.000330341,0.00009821069,0.0001543607,0.000342083,0.0001833786,0.0001983685,0.000157398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003344077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001629347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007648439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00716088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999162,0.00001514088,0.000003643236,0.00003503373,0.00001516024,0.00001473061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993399,0.0003213423,0.0001521012,0.00005947717,0.0000720013,0.00005523037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001375142,0.0002005009,0.4545188,0.0002069912,0.0002467027,0.0002626457,0.001114471,0.02397946,0.4803046,0.0007078886,0.0009401219,0.03614274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000216949,0.0002857732,0.8803118,0.000009538534,0.00002727474,0.0001671478,0.0001104674,0.1107056,0.007762273,0.0004177739,0.0001600729,0.00002055266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947195,0.00005478477,0.00472186,0.0000153424,0.000004092749,0.00001060724,0.00007196078,0.00004508695,0.0003567131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988777,0.00002488613,0.0008887509,0.00000444745,0.000001192902,0.000004359715,0.00007882082,0.000005740215,0.0001140522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007648439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01520783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01335351757097087,"score_gpt":0.2960426909705418,"score_spread":0.2826891733995709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}