{"id":"W2085411249","doi":"10.1167/10.7.526","title":"Second-order saliency predicts observer eye movements when viewing natural images","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Salience (neuroscience); Eye movement; Fixation (population genetics); Luminance; Computer science; Observer (physics); Natural (archaeology); Salient; Filter (signal processing); Scene statistics; Saccadic masking; Eye tracking; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology; Perception; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006812807,0.0001229292,0.0001729142,0.0001830913,0.0001435553,0.000217156,0.0006129151,0.00007067071,0.000226112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001097716,0.00009204406,0.0001400114,0.0002510001,0.00002564117,0.001882863,0.0001548391,0.0005033109,0.00003647371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002964386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005032806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003300271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000587457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984669,0.0000699223,0.0004875959,0.0001871646,0.0005876872,0.0002007475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988412,0.00002855401,0.0003836627,0.0002449988,0.000379684,0.0001219034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000447797,0.0004667001,0.008874943,0.00005417743,0.00006022018,0.00007049335,0.001567058,0.0000367213,0.8322376,0.0008849112,0.009271086,0.1464313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002436438,0.001304683,0.896061,0.0002761908,0.00002502304,0.0002335834,0.00008561959,0.02252633,0.02968575,0.005867349,0.04102577,0.0004722418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524338,0.0001785556,0.04026577,0.0007000418,0.005571744,0.00008440929,9.744772e-7,0.00004571229,0.0007190031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823505,0.00002192905,0.0157835,0.0004495094,0.0002370014,8.165235e-7,6.762619e-7,0.000008182463,0.001147848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3753448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01335351757097087,"score_gpt":0.2960426909705418,"score_spread":0.2826891733995709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}