{"id":"W2085461405","doi":"10.1002/hyp.7596","title":"Comparative probabilistic assessment of the hydrological performance of reconstructed and natural watersheds","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Evapotranspiration; Environmental science; Watershed; Hydrology (agriculture); Water content; Vegetation (pathology); Probabilistic logic; Land cover; Moisture; Canopy; Soil science; Land use; Computer science; Mathematics; Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Statistics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774173,0.0001600845,0.000330692,0.0000208388,0.0001777279,0.000006823431,0.0003299592,0.0001070828,0.0003603489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001420408,0.00008149501,0.00003893536,0.0002288227,0.002683757,0.000151592,0.0004963063,0.0003490026,0.000006117333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001009547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001113343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001297752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005415703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988796,0.00008009723,0.0002930444,0.0003116314,0.0002005211,0.0002351207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994028,0.0001691303,0.0001735402,0.0001898882,0.00002595415,0.00003866717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000939676,0.0001921548,0.978628,0.000153469,0.00004344336,0.000001586946,0.0003522871,0.00151541,0.01813191,0.0004943794,0.00005822248,0.000335144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000410341,0.0005292544,0.972644,0.00001584412,0.00005845414,0.00002082538,0.00003834707,0.01231605,0.009002722,0.004434701,0.0003453207,0.0001841077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935728,0.0000278943,0.000009312362,0.0005288548,0.0001134856,0.0003001098,0.000002863941,0.00002506497,0.005419655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991614,0.00002858576,0.0005407917,0.0001441819,0.00001110072,0.00003007788,0.000002006273,0.000003227659,0.00007863819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01080064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01462575767762869,"score_gpt":0.2465462675827165,"score_spread":0.2319205099050878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}