{"id":"W2085536117","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0033460","title":"Sensitivity and Bias in Decision-Making under Risk: Evaluating the Perception of Reward, Its Probability and Value","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Prospect theory; Subjective expected utility; Psychology; Discriminative model; Frequentist probability; Econometrics; Perception; Sensitivity (control systems); Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01972154,0.0001407062,0.0003996229,0.0001715489,0.0001987151,0.0001399923,0.000177194,0.0001049228,0.00006894342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01770917,0.0000907307,0.00005626222,0.0003702868,0.0001676183,0.0005065386,0.00029665,0.0002483239,0.00003543388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007297201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004125609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008076318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001536517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996594,0.001005289,0.0007291385,0.0004405761,0.00097352,0.000257527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989601,0.009106115,0.0004130679,0.0005308958,0.0002632377,0.00008564955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009438756,0.000501088,0.5889027,0.000009725192,0.00001223766,7.855534e-7,0.001694482,0.000389693,0.003863765,0.0001317521,0.0000097999,0.4043896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002526431,0.0001101661,0.8943592,0.0002549519,0.00006772469,0.000009817782,0.001305249,0.02523164,0.0002241707,0.07804087,0.000003396451,0.0001402225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985644,0.000198603,0.0004679171,0.0001714217,0.000078841,0.0003624485,0.00001593581,0.00001411652,0.0001263551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861087,0.00003817114,0.01372065,0.00004557976,0.00005614717,0.00000724392,4.408135e-7,0.000009867372,0.00001321941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4042493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3876118862229526,"score_gpt":0.4251982905205114,"score_spread":0.03758640429755888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}