{"id":"W2085564160","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.023","title":"Effect of a Standardized Quality-Improvement Protocol on Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computed tomographic angiography; Computed tomographic; Coronary angiography; Radiation dose; Medicine; Protocol (science); Medical physics; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Angiography; Computed tomography; Internal medicine; Myocardial infarction; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002627092,0.0001362063,0.001030132,0.0004349604,0.00002665518,0.000005545769,0.0001197524,0.00003957438,0.000002922959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004490632,0.0000821249,0.0007182819,0.0005020062,0.0005027955,0.00002346193,0.00002366999,0.0005119585,6.940477e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000294601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003236768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001183845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979979,0.0008651468,0.0005305159,0.0001142749,0.000306222,0.0001858712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973744,0.00140429,0.000655675,0.0002996195,0.000178633,0.0000874422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01618327,0.00008893178,0.7463974,0.00006796768,0.0007400665,0.000119835,0.0001447453,0.0004440774,0.02014975,0.00005654207,0.000602081,0.2150053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008113997,0.01563516,0.9700802,0.00008777554,0.000291382,0.0004472861,0.00007743129,0.00001802215,0.003344088,0.00008031591,0.001727152,0.00009716467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911274,0.00005564928,0.0003605433,0.0005242064,0.000257358,0.007402323,0.00001089984,0.00001038029,0.0002511915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983892,0.00001294564,0.000177842,0.0002748523,0.0003023352,0.0008265841,0.000002891682,0.00001242577,9.250678e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2236828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3348956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007237431092397133,"score_gpt":0.3282184232753305,"score_spread":0.3209809921829334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}