{"id":"W2085567163","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.023","title":"Optimal location of Hybrid Flow Controller considering modified steady-state model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"MATLAB; Control theory (sociology); Electric power system; Controller (irrigation); Mathematical optimization; Linear programming; Integer programming; Computer science; Power (physics); Control engineering; Hybrid power; Flow (mathematics); Engineering; Mathematics; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003639908,0.0007675033,0.0009314398,0.0004754333,0.0006050014,0.001580986,0.0007126056,0.001067532,0.002915406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008136411,0.0003498092,0.0003784104,0.0002524386,0.0005837965,0.0007821289,0.0005321357,0.0005519757,0.0003289341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006515085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007787436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005881855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004348218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998313,0.00004575491,0.000005743713,0.00004475079,0.0000312359,0.00004121748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997519,0.00008084107,0.00003792082,0.00001851204,0.00009366958,0.00001719919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002065563,0.00003880163,0.0004230817,0.00005302027,0.00003125745,0.00007216081,0.0000507252,0.9740778,0.003385217,0.006654058,0.0008588302,0.01414859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001490309,0.00002616791,0.0001108026,0.000002521643,0.000005628292,0.000004551532,0.00000814198,0.9981537,0.0004884467,0.001041358,0.0001394586,0.000004207255],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1272927,0.0002424917,0.8581224,0.000297629,0.0001796643,0.00008460043,0.00009016866,0.0004734089,0.01321698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984445,0.00004229726,0.0138759,0.00002079933,0.00001557242,0.00004892891,0.00002918618,0.00001337118,0.001508965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005881855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01169521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008985020330488843,"score_gpt":0.1923494073171552,"score_spread":0.1833643869866664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}