{"id":"W2085598377","doi":"10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.024","title":"Specimen diameter and “side artifacts” in cancellous bone evaluated using end-constrained elastic tension","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bone","topic":"Elasticity and Material Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cancellous bone; Tension (geology); Materials science; Composite material; Biomedical engineering; Orthodontics; Anatomy; Medicine; Ultimate tensile strength","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002291677,0.0004483015,0.0003690689,0.0008193931,0.0003199583,0.0005615199,0.0004129928,0.000820367,0.001962878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005662324,0.0005998879,0.0002055906,0.0004314083,0.0005618741,0.0008075771,0.0005027063,0.0003758087,0.0002279805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002559937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003096322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006819324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001419844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991572,0.0002327389,0.00008312891,0.0001473507,0.0003346727,0.00004493283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909359,0.005755577,0.001213108,0.0009437224,0.0008940388,0.0002577877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006381131,0.0003141947,0.02158224,0.0003275362,0.00007495931,0.00100534,0.000536494,0.0152424,0.9232209,0.000570439,0.0002001005,0.03054447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001448014,0.002071818,0.1571046,0.00006351493,0.0003999807,0.004676311,0.0003317959,0.1010518,0.7322695,0.0004743063,0.001312446,0.00009913377],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655361,0.0007330508,0.03189117,0.00003272638,0.0000241833,0.00002803328,0.000118515,0.0002812745,0.001355129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923844,0.0001046459,0.006490587,0.00002874009,0.00000941433,0.00001482048,0.0000942338,0.000142708,0.0007303662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002291677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01211971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01758074452513333,"score_gpt":0.2245558002193693,"score_spread":0.206975055694236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}