{"id":"W2085621738","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003","title":"Relationship between quality management practices and innovation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":692,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Knowledge management; Certification; Product innovation; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Process management; Set (abstract data type); Quality management; Value (mathematics); Innovation management; New product development; Service (business); Computer science; Marketing; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007675235,0.0001734088,0.0002522952,0.002680075,0.0005220603,0.002234457,0.0006448504,0.0006118565,0.002263891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09114499,0.0001614625,0.0004508316,0.004125169,0.001332688,0.001526694,0.001503768,0.001631911,0.0001582724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001901296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001584104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002438791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00235204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9888844,0.005085158,0.001047547,0.0008797059,0.003430168,0.0006729127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.656961,0.2098164,0.1029242,0.008743822,0.01755256,0.004002045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004348106,0.0002136518,0.9576721,0.00009859613,0.0001485736,0.00004574733,0.0007144688,0.0008404298,0.0003521891,0.001801113,0.0001636954,0.03790596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084409,0.0001931908,0.9927216,0.00009822672,0.00005530836,0.0001021002,0.0009807784,0.001971998,0.0003876408,0.001958973,0.001505825,0.00001597102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894907,0.000996781,0.002833582,0.0009290755,0.00001495696,0.00004222675,0.0001353676,0.00002945758,0.005527837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989711,0.0001195907,0.0006873859,0.00002374704,0.00001091022,0.0000103196,0.00004197444,0.000002810099,0.0001320343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007675235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1639335426794735,"score_gpt":0.3761394860560485,"score_spread":0.212205943376575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}