{"id":"W2085631282","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0031386","title":"Assessment of Metagenomic Assembly Using Simulated Next Generation Sequencing Data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Molecular Biology Laboratory","keywords":"Metagenomics; Contig; Sanger sequencing; Pyrosequencing; Computational biology; Genome; Illumina dye sequencing; Biology; Sequence assembly; DNA sequencing; Computer science; Genetics; Gene; Transcriptome","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01164377,0.001440485,0.001066433,0.001031587,0.0008355074,0.001317091,0.001528435,0.001346101,0.0007721444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02912134,0.0008553971,0.001336361,0.001118971,0.0006659013,0.001452076,0.00111552,0.001177829,0.000235078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001433568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005881375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003392373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961152,0.002171959,0.0003320656,0.0004448129,0.0007579441,0.0001780104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845518,0.0106962,0.0007884936,0.001541644,0.002034574,0.0003872847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005743581,0.0001622369,0.01631134,0.0001767298,0.0001778659,0.0001180238,0.0002003423,0.9616457,0.01278773,0.001697384,0.0001708475,0.005977559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002625536,0.0001094426,0.001973008,0.0000103017,0.00002053779,0.00002082393,0.00003538076,0.9899454,0.00690792,0.0006838665,0.0002477148,0.00001930584],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8396145,0.0002307164,0.1565787,0.0002104707,0.00003347599,0.000235625,0.00133489,0.0008606928,0.0009011188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8746937,0.000159753,0.1216353,0.00009148125,0.000008585132,0.0003471821,0.00268111,0.0002160255,0.0001668391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01164377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3084644898469056,"score_gpt":0.327394927231686,"score_spread":0.01893043738478045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}