{"id":"W2085821614","doi":"10.1002/chp.70","title":"Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: Introducing education into regulatory assessment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Peer assessment; Program evaluation; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02683446,0.0005843187,0.0004429971,0.000879727,0.001133204,0.001489547,0.002363125,0.001215135,0.004958291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08379497,0.0003953087,0.0006426739,0.0004241609,0.0008865745,0.002017047,0.003374607,0.001286818,0.0006757649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001692846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01120351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003522245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004907117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9651002,0.02489683,0.001347375,0.001643653,0.005998251,0.001013666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9179416,0.05330504,0.007034793,0.007104374,0.008896909,0.005717417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001832389,0.0222797,0.03002903,0.001612056,0.0001146135,0.0003333808,0.00665386,0.00153309,0.002896095,0.0005489042,0.004507758,0.9276591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01304456,0.1558715,0.5867235,0.005688565,0.001203877,0.003289395,0.01419014,0.03248059,0.02696455,0.005252561,0.1546061,0.0006845855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938295,0.001003543,0.02105362,0.004835885,0.0003023791,0.009099063,0.0001007106,0.001285094,0.02402477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290621,0.0004735403,0.06368195,0.0009145722,0.0001837651,0.002735847,0.0000913957,0.00004307571,0.002813765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1419159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01133599226227226,"score_gpt":0.4592587973030869,"score_spread":0.4479228050408147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}