{"id":"W2085866881","doi":"10.1533/ijcr.2005.0117","title":"Crash analysis and modeling of two vehicles in frontal collisions using two types of smart front-end structures: an analytical approach using IHBM","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Crashworthiness","topic":"Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Crashworthiness; Crash; Collision; Offset (computer science); Front and back ends; Computer science; Intrusion; Front (military); Engineering; Automotive engineering; Simulation; Mechanical engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001851376,0.0003129832,0.0002359337,0.0004623203,0.0001682226,0.0003286645,0.000525874,0.0004993696,0.00159629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371048,0.000192501,0.0004289486,0.0001341441,0.0003519714,0.0003716103,0.0002883009,0.0002238095,0.0001818989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002817879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002278418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002301819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001398557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999229,0.00001497575,0.000002865669,0.000008223802,0.00003773836,0.00001324957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999065,0.00003307104,0.00001463468,0.00001282971,0.00002735879,0.000005500696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004368285,0.00004517355,0.001827331,0.00003824393,0.00001844406,0.0002126661,0.0000712143,0.964415,0.01730824,0.005440957,0.0001165765,0.01046248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002339789,0.00003297713,0.0004340908,0.000002067794,0.000004602173,0.00002446477,0.00001880953,0.9978988,0.00105772,0.000386618,0.0001349002,0.000002602602],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5930701,0.0002045015,0.3993556,0.00007153257,0.0000225198,0.00004584651,0.0000531061,0.0001094528,0.007067334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918994,0.00006404274,0.006289587,0.00000659342,0.000003211679,0.00001793789,0.00001549832,0.000004582651,0.001699204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002301819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005340159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04364790518562511,"score_gpt":0.3563528588859742,"score_spread":0.3127049537003491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}