{"id":"W2085898785","doi":"10.1007/s11009-006-9001-7","title":"Optimum Burn-in Time for a Bathtub Shaped Failure Distribution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methodology And Computing In Applied Probability","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bathtub; Burn-in; Mathematics; Failure rate; Estimator; Statistics; Reliability (semiconductor); Residual; Applied mathematics; Interval (graph theory); Function (biology); Reliability theory; Accelerated failure time model; Point estimation; Algorithm; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004087484,0.0006391369,0.001287347,0.001098274,0.0005992905,0.001037812,0.001440142,0.001693801,0.004752032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01169487,0.0008860746,0.0008793108,0.0006586428,0.001425784,0.001780216,0.001312782,0.001830138,0.000500016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001224636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001394686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001228529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001614763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994106,0.0002153666,0.00002915159,0.0001163723,0.0001136861,0.0001148512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932586,0.005088306,0.0004678602,0.000304004,0.0004716551,0.0004096674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000876061,0.0001032373,0.00141399,0.000240883,0.00004639837,0.0001104521,0.0001763932,0.9110677,0.009496792,0.04488679,0.000893817,0.0306875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002397763,0.00005647993,0.0003797686,0.00001990255,0.00001919065,0.00003548717,0.00002956847,0.9812238,0.002049742,0.01589739,0.0002518754,0.00001284165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0635775,0.0002948551,0.934414,0.0001929579,0.00002715922,0.00005246898,0.00005852165,0.0002493745,0.001133228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7289099,0.0004028611,0.2652679,0.0001146669,0.00003467934,0.0002025452,0.0001654137,0.0003187157,0.004583352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004752032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02161694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.13777033006529,"score_gpt":0.4005622061055105,"score_spread":0.2627918760402204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}