{"id":"W2086209697","doi":"10.1139/x03-068","title":"Distribution of cavity trees in midwestern old-growth and second-growth forests","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Diameter at breast height; Mathematics; Hardwood; Forestry; Tree (set theory); Logistic regression; Dead tree; Old-growth forest; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Combinatorics; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001009386,0.00008151421,0.0001987234,0.00009442658,0.0002711416,0.00003196083,0.0002171465,0.0001129412,0.0001034177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008542964,0.00003748465,0.0000567497,0.0004261061,0.0004909326,0.0001465296,0.00002808969,0.0003196297,0.000003407967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007935146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001413682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01627872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8599588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988328,0.0002146929,0.0002281477,0.0001252515,0.000194049,0.000405097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988638,0.0002894123,0.00008638563,0.00003127933,0.0004232762,0.0003059035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002342185,0.00002570957,0.9960216,0.00001228704,0.00001285932,0.00008467398,0.000123836,0.000001220449,0.0002789558,0.002321683,0.0008373123,0.0002564377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002326726,0.000504755,0.993875,0.00003434845,0.000004339734,0.00004490109,0.0004613328,7.976106e-7,0.0006236779,0.003161538,0.0009917587,0.00006489654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978279,0.0004144583,3.901914e-7,0.001109099,0.00006222985,0.00009736283,0.00009354232,0.000001315789,0.0003936956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997441,0.00007030965,0.000007937278,0.00002700196,0.0000346442,0.000001271071,0.00001034239,4.811794e-7,0.0001038833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8436801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03805141347703946,"score_gpt":0.2541377546765276,"score_spread":0.2160863411994881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}