{"id":"W2086244897","doi":"10.1037/a0032432","title":"The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Bulletin","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Physical attractiveness; Predictive validity; Social psychology; Preference; Attractiveness; Ideal (ethics); Appeal; External validity; Romance; Predictive power; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02381881,0.001802877,0.007853574,0.009356217,0.0004300538,0.003110493,0.002706487,0.001736089,0.003757207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07610618,0.001166337,0.01274696,0.0106196,0.001161278,0.002155189,0.001487712,0.001783281,0.0003758078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001708952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004068752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004244756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008089658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914469,0.003623189,0.002562477,0.001066932,0.001179776,0.0001207628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906429,0.09583996,0.008034563,0.001994615,0.003084495,0.0004034101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009567185,0.00007988461,0.01190578,0.552618,0.2388004,0.0001547504,0.0003729632,0.0007484493,0.0002593213,0.001064854,0.00445305,0.1885859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003733627,0.0004284784,0.03054951,0.2262236,0.7077093,0.0006350956,0.0003549781,0.0006240766,0.000535935,0.003229179,0.02919667,0.0001398217],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009149889,0.9977072,0.0004264689,0.0002792151,0.00006788644,0.00004881346,0.0003573489,0.00001225184,0.0001858134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03328806,0.9630309,0.001827577,0.000587536,0.0001809575,0.0002076573,0.0007749775,0.0000201075,0.00008218931],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02381881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1259674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3832773512613736,"score_gpt":0.4709590603514053,"score_spread":0.0876817090900317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}