{"id":"W2086244897","doi":"10.1037/a0032432","title":"The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Psychological Bulletin","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Physical attractiveness; Predictive validity; Social psychology; Preference; Attractiveness; Ideal (ethics); Appeal; External validity; Romance; Predictive power; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002157295,0.0007964929,0.005893478,0.0001753399,0.0002952903,0.00003885525,0.001157217,0.0009773585,0.07597519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001642225,0.0003875753,0.003269749,0.0005927918,0.001370195,0.00002692573,0.0001982401,0.001333943,0.002442472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002445159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002069404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002070355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004844296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919134,0.003810476,0.001825722,0.001460016,0.000361644,0.0006287916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994638,0.001938205,0.001365122,0.001658869,0.0001844874,0.0002152966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006129335,0.001441145,0.00007327562,0.005338844,0.1765825,0.0000327891,0.0001043848,9.451239e-8,1.877457e-8,0.01044739,0.6712016,0.1347166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000927272,0.0002737702,0.0009720253,0.0001232712,0.3581218,0.00004757791,0.000007529727,1.653509e-8,2.490604e-9,0.0005754967,0.6395401,0.0002457557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005283571,0.9780607,0.0000351021,0.001227881,0.0002879552,0.002521022,0.0003337678,0.0000764135,0.01745193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005437891,0.98214,0.0001411821,0.0009124099,0.00008791724,0.004109574,0.0001224652,0.00003547223,0.01239661],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1815392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3832773512613736,"score_gpt":0.4709590603514053,"score_spread":0.0876817090900317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}