{"id":"W2086356947","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2012.75","title":"Meta-analysis of genetic association studies under heterogeneity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McMaster University","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Genetic association; Genetic heterogeneity; Biology; Association (psychology); Genome-wide association study; Genetic variants; Genetic model; Genetic epidemiology; Study heterogeneity; Statistical power; Cohort; Random effects model; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Statistics; Medicine; Gene; Phenotype; Psychology; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Mathematics; Genotype; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003518983,0.0004749517,0.003906985,0.0004350006,0.0001034765,0.00001981612,0.000634891,0.0002522219,0.00006167073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002683516,0.0003623589,0.004579038,0.0003658057,0.0001011572,0.000003208749,0.0002773056,0.0003146679,0.00001419445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001071068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001170498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001093284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001777543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931968,0.003210125,0.002477224,0.0003388181,0.0003832323,0.0003937622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928945,0.00020629,0.005370822,0.0006385629,0.0007388368,0.0001509711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000634636,0.0002210144,0.002583304,0.001008461,0.9457527,0.00001306538,0.000144519,0.001858943,0.0001942545,0.000009574275,0.003003299,0.04520455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001677834,0.0004550286,0.004893095,0.00005712528,0.6173865,0.00002656821,0.00003735159,0.000001522605,0.00003166909,0.0000165532,0.3765747,0.0003521571],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00563035,0.9930355,0.0006195605,0.00002427574,0.0002744363,0.0001660872,0.00008492791,0.000003158414,0.0001617369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01104641,0.9852015,0.002331404,0.00009013691,0.0006189807,0.000004402029,0.0001021815,0.00008058094,0.000524453],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3735714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2909538325229932,"score_gpt":0.4061419402472853,"score_spread":0.1151881077242921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}