{"id":"W2086356947","doi":"10.1038/ejhg.2012.75","title":"Meta-analysis of genetic association studies under heterogeneity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Human Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Population Health Research Institute","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McMaster University","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Genetic association; Genetic heterogeneity; Biology; Association (psychology); Genome-wide association study; Genetic variants; Genetic model; Genetic epidemiology; Study heterogeneity; Statistical power; Cohort; Random effects model; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Statistics; Medicine; Gene; Phenotype; Psychology; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Mathematics; Genotype; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02685337,0.003184908,0.01432374,0.004975114,0.0003430813,0.002599407,0.003604135,0.002402291,0.002700258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05395917,0.001326356,0.01547295,0.006943401,0.0007489111,0.001799373,0.001614961,0.002108045,0.0003499486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001116136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002168862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001829283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003264066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9798125,0.01352206,0.002372485,0.002471979,0.001550928,0.0002700917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9287719,0.06420438,0.003138976,0.0023367,0.001306942,0.0002411802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003122823,0.00008258955,0.01719783,0.07227016,0.528084,0.0006126093,0.0001080371,0.004267066,0.0007362545,0.002395182,0.005467942,0.3656555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001525442,0.0008489593,0.03211309,0.01812326,0.8696902,0.003202462,0.0001572911,0.004959188,0.00137459,0.0344647,0.03330107,0.0002398494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001543183,0.9923268,0.005068357,0.0004750767,0.0001724168,0.00002318492,0.0002002193,0.00003930483,0.0001515129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07917579,0.9012772,0.01537661,0.001393576,0.001371996,0.000167969,0.0008336877,0.00007800818,0.000325199],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1420159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2909538325229932,"score_gpt":0.4061419402472853,"score_spread":0.1151881077242921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}