{"id":"W2086405819","doi":"10.1080/02786826.2013.805875","title":"A Calibration Technique for Improving Refractive Index Retrieval from Aerosol Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aerosol Science and Technology","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Aerosol; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Particle (ecology); Cavity ring-down spectroscopy; Spectroscopy; Refractive index; Optics; Differential mobility analyzer; Mie scattering; Chemistry; Computational physics; Physics; Light scattering; Scattering; Absorption spectroscopy; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001728286,0.0009594986,0.0004957665,0.001078839,0.000557761,0.0005523728,0.001209971,0.0008210243,0.001065268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00446471,0.0004963535,0.0004698694,0.00127006,0.0004207226,0.001054205,0.0008996954,0.001254138,0.0007935967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008551719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007598042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002474278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002670728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986811,0.0001556445,0.00004943329,0.0004169568,0.0006288827,0.00006805699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986562,0.0003446676,0.0001547641,0.0003022077,0.0005198725,0.00002229531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007151779,0.000100675,0.002817487,0.0001480414,0.00004402034,0.00007440084,0.0001038864,0.008955502,0.8734144,0.002250405,0.0008615876,0.1111581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002934021,0.0001636049,0.004041446,0.00002316232,0.00004231083,0.0002363161,0.00002395393,0.1258221,0.8590367,0.000589147,0.009912555,0.00007926793],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.084994,0.001156364,0.9081417,0.0001673265,0.0002392344,0.0002454144,0.000287109,0.002804351,0.00196462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2394993,0.0008676348,0.7571253,0.0001872463,0.00005879819,0.0002475085,0.0003616415,0.0002595409,0.001393194],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002474278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009140134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007101304802258503,"score_gpt":0.2198351744124552,"score_spread":0.2127338696101967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}