{"id":"W2086427025","doi":"10.1002/tea.20412","title":"A study of laughter in science lessons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Seriousness; Phenomenon; Solidarity; Dialectic; Psychology; Complicity; Science class; Boredom; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Science education; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02950141,0.00005484232,0.0001772506,0.001945504,0.0004417629,0.00004549883,0.001470936,0.00001779375,0.00005328503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007730415,0.00004097251,0.00002497081,0.002979819,0.001673781,0.0003034546,0.0003270861,0.001054846,0.000009497509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000172405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001200456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003518178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971011,0.0003135945,0.0004629036,0.0002479767,0.001315813,0.0005586047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.0002278026,0.0001650358,0.0003241205,0.0002627526,0.0001252331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007200395,0.004125476,0.5182928,0.000007841827,0.000009475673,0.0002169911,0.3947084,0.00001669507,0.009209962,0.05220224,0.0002202643,0.02091788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702452,0.0006994407,0.7937293,0.00009407715,0.000001848773,0.00004197039,0.2022292,0.00003720719,0.0002378842,0.001906627,0.0002894624,0.00006271524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570659,0.00005220184,0.00002133263,0.0006069244,0.0001251319,0.0001761458,3.860708e-7,0.000002188214,0.04194981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999048,0.000007123039,0.0008125084,0.00001040323,0.00003541794,0.00001155497,6.734702e-9,0.000003461661,0.00007150715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4781167332552305,"score_gpt":0.6013513138150917,"score_spread":0.1232345805598612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}