{"id":"W2086427025","doi":"10.1002/tea.20412","title":"A study of laughter in science lessons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Seriousness; Phenomenon; Solidarity; Dialectic; Psychology; Complicity; Science class; Boredom; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Science education; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490314,0.0003838429,0.0008109531,0.001710448,0.003387582,0.002765382,0.001014861,0.001371311,0.00342463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01516262,0.0004288913,0.0002493238,0.0006994602,0.003083226,0.001159289,0.002836116,0.002052329,0.0007363359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000548673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003422198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978653,0.001074478,0.00007164147,0.0002253563,0.0004967651,0.0002665596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908833,0.005267406,0.001418407,0.0006382049,0.0009080207,0.0008846633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002037735,0.0004489711,0.05539419,0.0002598783,0.00003476112,0.002936737,0.8852555,0.0001011221,0.02634609,0.001427596,0.001614635,0.02597677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383919,0.0008915614,0.2245453,0.0003187121,0.00002916069,0.004453345,0.7280062,0.0009177386,0.007490932,0.001862314,0.03134627,0.0001045868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960489,0.0001168319,0.0007254893,0.0002251942,0.00002085601,0.00003039521,0.00002250318,0.00002327359,0.00278653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969116,0.0001190562,0.0004700934,0.0001314414,0.00002024132,0.00003529249,0.00003512648,0.00002039461,0.002256956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00342463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01145655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4781167332552305,"score_gpt":0.6013513138150917,"score_spread":0.1232345805598612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}