{"id":"W2086911225","doi":"10.1080/20018091095140","title":"Strategies for Protecting and Restoring Rhode Island's Watersheds on Multiple Scales","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Water Quality and Resources Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Watershed Watch Salmon Society; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Natural resource; Environmental planning; Geographic information system; Process (computing); Water quality; Clean Water Act; Aquatic ecosystem; Geography; Scale (ratio); Environmental protection; Environmental science; Business; Computer science; Ecology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002720103,0.0005339304,0.0002932171,0.002281956,0.003302966,0.004117534,0.001717887,0.001615572,0.004798525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003399333,0.0002429253,0.0003951452,0.001675933,0.00216596,0.003036634,0.006275567,0.001574402,0.0005301802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002896848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01184227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05897812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2038199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985454,0.0006562964,0.00006515342,0.0001262371,0.0003505833,0.000256379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988316,0.0002007635,0.0001870583,0.0001729477,0.0002537572,0.0003539193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003173057,0.000543533,0.02977253,0.0006396031,0.0001429233,0.001795953,0.01701266,0.008904454,0.008764806,0.08620583,0.101776,0.7444099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001055637,0.0004366549,0.1148739,0.001092793,0.0001854308,0.001423828,0.09263048,0.01125341,0.003827712,0.08832946,0.6856539,0.0001869534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2993208,0.009401097,0.1099146,0.181971,0.0005789341,0.00272399,0.0004927518,0.002886444,0.3927104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7185434,0.008412411,0.2313016,0.005790934,0.0001957942,0.001360703,0.0004801533,0.0001756565,0.03373921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05897812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1172696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1018834145112958,"score_gpt":0.3483701189009712,"score_spread":0.2464867043896755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}