{"id":"W2087014302","doi":"10.1139/f03-043","title":"Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.A.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maryland Department of Natural Resources; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Rural Development Administration; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Ecoregion; Riparian zone; Watershed; STREAMS; Environmental science; Ecology; Macrophyte; Percidae; Wetland; Predatory fish; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Habitat; Perch; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003502761,0.0001345286,0.0001285127,0.000943822,0.0003565822,0.0003570491,0.0001481671,0.0001125541,0.0007323519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001099264,0.0001299747,0.0001623686,0.001189227,0.0003885477,0.0003084598,0.0004779607,0.0001338797,0.0001042203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006671546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007267874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1131298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.379517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997805,0.00005838817,0.00001651179,0.00004789684,0.00005632444,0.00004031003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.0001696398,0.0002781224,0.00003293102,0.0001218186,0.0001532944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029029,0.000006023608,0.9982868,0.000003303486,0.00001550659,0.00002192978,0.0001199673,0.00005822265,0.0001255768,0.00001411172,0.00005241211,0.001285868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.878497e-7,0.000007285054,0.9996221,0.000002128382,0.000004680263,0.0000157134,0.0001455031,0.0001065895,0.00001222412,0.0000126185,0.00006972053,8.134591e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995496,0.00005541588,0.00003367181,0.00001422271,6.235419e-7,0.000001827696,0.0001822047,0.000002041892,0.0001604328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992829,0.00007506627,0.0001360076,0.00001074308,0.000002236329,0.000006133796,0.0003910354,0.000001666649,0.00009417539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1131298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01415727462387497,"score_gpt":0.2018535829691746,"score_spread":0.1876963083452996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}