{"id":"W2087032783","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.048","title":"The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forest management; Baseline (sea); Environmental resource management; Management by objectives; Disturbance (geology); Decision support system; Recreation; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Business; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322022,0.0008328033,0.0005886323,0.001452168,0.002728594,0.002554804,0.001239834,0.0009328764,0.002309158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008834285,0.0004584372,0.000292499,0.001984238,0.001020612,0.000835115,0.0008184711,0.0006615417,0.0002162069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02116298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01713624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9336241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9491491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987161,0.0004707526,0.0001107119,0.0001677982,0.000304544,0.0002301413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949505,0.002771395,0.0002605396,0.0001706456,0.001419083,0.0004276764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00192646,0.001718921,0.08842092,0.0003155271,0.0002389888,0.001393971,0.002258576,0.74212,0.005314375,0.002141249,0.004592962,0.1495579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003062003,0.0003827598,0.02459864,0.0000310398,0.000103488,0.00004568159,0.001895447,0.9680539,0.001992302,0.0007843688,0.001741638,0.00006456208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886049,0.0001016894,0.005946127,0.0002438885,0.00001185888,0.0004169998,0.0003447542,0.0003086352,0.004021053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840094,0.00007242749,0.01424145,0.00003390215,0.000002969362,0.00008911809,0.0001961772,0.00001811843,0.001336429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06637591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1535489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007214553876689381,"score_gpt":0.2461647675449462,"score_spread":0.2389502136682568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}