{"id":"W2087032783","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.048","title":"The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forest management; Baseline (sea); Environmental resource management; Management by objectives; Disturbance (geology); Decision support system; Recreation; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Business; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006373458,0.0001611204,0.0002347508,0.00006667627,0.0005975105,0.0002188369,0.0003682114,0.00004527052,0.00004183618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008857731,0.0001790179,0.00003534649,0.0003970131,0.0001681717,0.0001187659,0.0007314703,0.0001049737,0.00006455014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004972968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004441911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8976124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981223,0.00008416681,0.0004802048,0.0005183405,0.0003418328,0.000453142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992327,0.00006932286,0.0001308764,0.000425273,0.00001510591,0.0001267043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008905578,0.0006062042,0.8827051,0.0001597209,0.0001778381,0.004213785,0.0007939808,0.07900546,1.639596e-7,0.002806378,0.001884584,0.02755772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002384564,0.0004391989,0.9789453,0.00004145172,0.000087024,0.000113229,0.008190388,0.003664314,5.724691e-8,0.0009379774,0.004987041,0.0002094197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887332,0.000008423291,0.001463599,0.0001008055,0.0001403787,0.004033836,0.000009701692,0.0000230811,0.005486919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962584,0.00003082145,0.000871057,0.0001527307,0.00001218133,0.001234461,0.0000069554,0.00001628284,0.001417062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1021103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7300138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007214553876689381,"score_gpt":0.2461647675449462,"score_spread":0.2389502136682568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}