{"id":"W2087033015","doi":"10.1115/1.533558","title":"Reliability Analysis of Non-Constant-Size Part Populations in Design for Remanufacture","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Population; Constant (computer programming); Computer science; Failure rate; Work (physics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843487,0.000124788,0.0005381124,0.000180751,0.00002721501,0.00001386012,0.000159237,0.0001613218,0.0002993491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007207561,0.0001037132,0.0002853668,0.0005893441,0.00002330051,0.00019105,0.000004705917,0.0002053229,0.000001291791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001173635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004846991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005493938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007991291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984135,0.0001422863,0.0009231333,0.0001286254,0.0002022256,0.0001902272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986704,0.0006889337,0.0001621472,0.0002168158,0.0001788168,0.00008289436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002628605,0.00007769594,0.00002208338,0.00002706788,0.0001202998,0.000002464865,0.00005887063,0.9937427,0.001764964,0.0001633179,0.0008223145,0.002935365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007193148,0.0002613064,0.001546495,0.00008637983,0.0004854449,0.000005002248,0.00002772368,0.9769576,0.005909712,0.01361122,0.0002497337,0.0001401117],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02505524,0.00005350704,0.9741365,0.0001165158,0.0001600515,0.0003611456,0.00001091445,0.00001585466,0.00009026113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7519846,0.0002091818,0.2476863,0.00002562693,0.00003372853,0.00000996277,0.00000250351,0.0000132401,0.00003485861],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4229303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03300391590878424,"score_gpt":0.2642141217130745,"score_spread":0.2312102058042903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}