{"id":"W2087060082","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2005.01.001","title":"Multi-attribute evaluation of landscape-level fuel management to reduce wildfire risk","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Risk management; Wildland–urban interface; Prescribed burn; Forest management; Sample (material); Climate change; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Geography; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007497136,0.0001139224,0.0001445593,0.0000715217,0.00006581035,0.00002261021,0.0001460695,0.00005162507,0.00008982694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005820355,0.000116032,0.00003481583,0.0000923323,0.00003903789,0.000191804,0.0001493789,0.00004732129,0.0004012979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002529279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001238316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001950388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99915,0.00004625006,0.0002367578,0.0002489862,0.00009671882,0.0002212298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994794,0.00003051416,0.0001233864,0.0002481589,0.000004730539,0.0001138599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005354622,0.000209709,0.5870177,0.00006789774,0.00009730614,7.315394e-7,0.001711789,0.1683888,0.0001516975,0.0007125437,0.005575726,0.2360126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752415,0.00004983256,0.8299237,0.00001294973,0.00003589397,0.00000362022,0.00004520182,0.1554678,0.0001486779,0.000218087,0.01307352,0.0001454946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953258,0.00004031095,0.000117368,0.0004591044,0.00007611769,0.0004800884,0.00008608308,0.00001386893,0.003401278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965265,0.0001252011,0.002575441,0.0001625751,0.0001344474,0.00004403059,0.00001269383,0.0000131021,0.0004060112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.242906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5158006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02808493496952644,"score_gpt":0.2665758639417995,"score_spread":0.2384909289722731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}