{"id":"W2087119719","doi":"10.1007/s10651-007-0028-x","title":"A framework for predicting personal exposures to environmental hazards","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","topic":"Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Bath; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hazard; Environmental epidemiology; Probabilistic logic; Underpinning; Population; Exposure assessment; Environmental science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Statistics; Mathematics; Environmental health; Engineering; Ecology; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005478205,0.0002130988,0.0001896085,0.00001956686,0.0004722367,0.00003392977,0.0001231281,0.0001451937,0.001955847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001570736,0.0001897478,0.00004891407,0.00003643952,0.0003070334,0.00006935831,0.0002976781,0.0001975944,0.0002115101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002670167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002063151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001464737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001068511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983082,0.00003113678,0.0003165328,0.0004606036,0.0003168224,0.0005666338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988399,0.0006260622,0.0000822576,0.00009982142,6.534859e-7,0.0003513354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589759,0.0004017892,0.8409322,0.00001283757,0.00002352645,0.00003126142,0.001877407,0.0001278799,0.006044061,0.0005874631,0.0009434331,0.1488592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003209007,0.0009223138,0.9833042,0.000008951734,0.00002419323,0.00001864719,0.001315555,0.001640478,0.0005034029,0.004339867,0.007264112,0.0003373724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8270395,0.00002692893,0.1717454,0.00008132761,0.0001692737,0.0003094231,0.0003751509,0.00003496698,0.0002180511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8631872,0.00001498982,0.135838,0.0003530586,0.0001889763,0.0000335347,0.0000402507,0.00001778351,0.000326238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1485218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02287432000856338,"score_gpt":0.2683909917141981,"score_spread":0.2455166717056347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}