{"id":"W2087278961","doi":"10.1071/zo07010","title":"Bat wing airfoil and planform structures relating to aerodynamic cleanliness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Wing; Airfoil; Lift-to-drag ratio; Wing loading; Camber (aerodynamics); Drag; Lift-induced drag; Leading edge; Planform; Trailing edge; Lift (data mining); Foraging; Aerodynamics; Angle of attack; Aerospace engineering; Marine engineering; Biology; Structural engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000232796,0.0003517309,0.0003122521,0.001160837,0.0007534128,0.00091216,0.0003240145,0.0004274638,0.002238291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000990122,0.0003464638,0.0003694498,0.0006321751,0.0009032192,0.0006048417,0.0006238608,0.0003468215,0.0003590083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005729473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003093855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01685837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998627,0.00002345524,0.000008354725,0.00003737631,0.0000413453,0.00002683165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993349,0.0001488824,0.0002746092,0.00005245543,0.0001169284,0.00007220364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003781051,0.00008350408,0.759504,0.0005260993,0.0001282703,0.0007912672,0.00274781,0.03186372,0.1483185,0.002686118,0.0004580836,0.05251457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002845683,0.0001302003,0.9807099,0.00002245624,0.00002411455,0.0006445649,0.0004275224,0.01439119,0.002320074,0.0005196949,0.0007872446,0.00002016261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947977,0.0002108408,0.00211966,0.00002760146,0.000002061675,0.00001799741,0.0001362411,0.00001739163,0.002670492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967808,0.0001072337,0.002068618,0.000009028305,0.000003127946,0.00001644984,0.0001395968,0.00001021711,0.0008648885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02014267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02299719079490543,"score_gpt":0.2542572390278348,"score_spread":0.2312600482329293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}