{"id":"W2087292762","doi":"10.2134/jeq2008.0250","title":"Assessment of Water Quality Trends in the Minnesota River using Non‐Parametric and Parametric Methods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Quality","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Drainage basin; Water quality; Tile drainage; Sediment; Drainage; Nutrient; Streamflow; Nitrate; Total suspended solids; Phosphorus; Suspended solids; Environmental engineering; Geography; Geology; Ecology; Soil water; Soil science; Chemical oxygen demand; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00451341,0.0003503142,0.0002712454,0.0006543426,0.0002268718,0.0006396685,0.0005080071,0.0002527635,0.000412124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01202289,0.0001743778,0.0007385574,0.0008562371,0.0003561153,0.0007800756,0.0004804339,0.0004506407,0.00007548574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005473402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02011091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03381742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978787,0.001066979,0.000146417,0.0004741548,0.0003314153,0.0001023214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889091,0.00753516,0.00145533,0.0008909517,0.001085289,0.000124211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003765275,0.0001155967,0.8738491,0.00008944429,0.0004492335,0.0001122689,0.0006979211,0.04794453,0.002729032,0.00136706,0.0004804734,0.07178875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001369018,0.0005745137,0.6494582,0.00001633141,0.00006878327,0.0001187996,0.0005732711,0.3457288,0.001425702,0.0009018859,0.001075425,0.00004446665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642483,0.0000666769,0.03413941,0.00004389226,0.000007445318,0.00004262558,0.0005235344,0.0001028698,0.000825225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909231,0.0000313273,0.008231579,0.00000921331,0.000003343574,0.00004504601,0.0005159228,0.00001171557,0.0002287117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02011091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03998768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04636192281149423,"score_gpt":0.3902713643533808,"score_spread":0.3439094415418866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}