{"id":"W2087370284","doi":"10.1017/s0266462305050439","title":"Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting coronary stents in Quebec, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Conventional PCI; Restenosis; Bare metal; Marginal cost; Cost effectiveness; Population; Revascularization; Cost–benefit analysis; Emergency medicine; Stent; Surgery; Internal medicine; Environmental health; Myocardial infarction; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004737622,0.00009946449,0.0003674269,0.0007552344,0.00001955674,0.000004913086,0.0002602807,0.00007966322,0.00005694075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000195436,0.0000969935,0.00007756375,0.0002105174,0.00004527155,0.0001026191,0.00008159824,0.0005346632,4.88072e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003913149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002417556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6759971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982129,0.000100503,0.0009565582,0.0001205408,0.00042584,0.000183602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998441,0.0002479854,0.0005307563,0.0001170099,0.0006013966,0.00006187437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002803692,0.0004772613,0.9061853,0.0002518593,0.00008249294,0.0005673082,0.0001560734,0.0013016,0.00006559837,0.001050922,0.0003174649,0.0892637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00359693,0.0003292264,0.980159,0.003704157,0.00001344154,0.0003338802,0.006645149,0.0001804999,0.0004841006,0.00009350592,0.004380434,0.00007971569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811326,0.002188212,0.000163025,0.01528038,0.0006751514,0.0003591853,0.00002621109,0.000008057879,0.0001671715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978743,0.000232022,0.001480248,0.0002718433,0.00005311202,0.00001511577,0.00002603527,0.000009146573,0.00003821108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02134086937190186,"score_gpt":0.3901905040972624,"score_spread":0.3688496347253605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}