{"id":"W2087385895","doi":"10.1890/09-1639.1","title":"Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Relative species abundance; Niche; Environmental niche modelling; Ecological niche; Carp; Common carp; Environmental science; Biology; Cyprinus; Fishery; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002828538,0.0001240516,0.0001682475,0.00001900591,0.00051216,0.00001517574,0.0005127363,0.00007202143,0.0006771872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005560194,0.00006500228,0.00005487631,0.000352503,0.0004331763,0.00008128856,0.000776399,0.000122332,0.0002206706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001315343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000827179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001632394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001944947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990547,0.00005832663,0.0002217924,0.0003249476,0.0001104426,0.0002297725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991294,0.0003029394,0.00009686981,0.0003731568,0.00001675421,0.00008091507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009753181,0.001378375,0.8598837,0.00001505605,0.0001630835,0.000001767017,0.004264244,0.05214946,0.001582122,0.02656888,0.05076369,0.003132118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000691849,0.0002213292,0.9809698,0.000001354755,0.0000290902,0.000001841878,0.0003020626,0.001699664,0.00004160017,0.01248884,0.004086261,0.00008891308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9179637,0.000014545,0.03986207,0.00284393,0.00002255432,0.003055352,0.0000413964,0.00004759847,0.03614883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953431,0.00003278863,0.001620351,0.001343663,0.00002580414,0.001402681,0.000003646862,0.000004979711,0.0002229838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1210862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7414725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06484702051987862,"score_gpt":0.2734179489821575,"score_spread":0.2085709284622789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}