{"id":"W2087385895","doi":"10.1890/09-1639.1","title":"Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Relative species abundance; Niche; Environmental niche modelling; Ecological niche; Carp; Common carp; Environmental science; Biology; Cyprinus; Fishery; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001046571,0.001118342,0.0004318128,0.0007059046,0.0004322705,0.0006260748,0.0006617794,0.0006332793,0.000388324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002133813,0.0004232,0.0007454871,0.0003776741,0.0003751023,0.0005336382,0.0006847389,0.0006060587,0.00008245571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00132914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001357634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1183029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09492493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998097,0.0000690867,0.00001468035,0.00006281747,0.00001898591,0.0000248321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.0005993262,0.0001509236,0.00003781974,0.0001149495,0.00006088573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003955492,0.00004725101,0.02014977,0.00001089283,0.00005921112,0.00004015859,0.00004675791,0.9740115,0.000579364,0.0001289291,0.00007123349,0.004815385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003314244,0.00001354001,0.002194241,0.000002607582,0.000006591488,0.000008111226,0.00001717255,0.9974797,0.00009457592,0.0001371871,0.00003749853,0.000005380764],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798777,0.0001620946,0.01875918,0.0001651669,0.00001118303,0.00002485086,0.0001388138,0.0001463536,0.0007148094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926802,0.00005654863,0.006777681,0.00001703376,0.000005456664,0.00001704802,0.0001043052,0.00001114079,0.0003305874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1183029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2352287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06484702051987862,"score_gpt":0.2734179489821575,"score_spread":0.2085709284622789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}