{"id":"W2087399459","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.024","title":"A Lagrangian relaxation approach to large-scale flow interception problems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lagrangian relaxation; Interception; Scale (ratio); Lagrangian; Flow (mathematics); Relaxation (psychology); Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Geography; Geometry; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003194416,0.00009266587,0.0001439757,0.0004213536,0.0002832776,0.00007920122,0.0002747956,0.00002728809,0.0001802512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002264014,0.00007598451,0.00009360832,0.0005735392,0.00005973568,0.0003625374,0.00003884578,0.0005645144,0.0001882063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006459346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002366513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006362685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978698,0.0005042881,0.0004189569,0.0001320296,0.0008179588,0.0002569373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989212,0.00004782191,0.00003508029,0.000145928,0.0006866831,0.0001632683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003302252,0.00008076642,0.0006854449,0.00002753622,0.00003942388,0.00002122868,0.00644496,0.9698541,0.009650719,0.0001057209,0.009291446,0.003765697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001564764,0.0008991537,0.1889489,0.0002029436,0.00002990556,0.000757638,0.002396439,0.7523235,0.001996791,0.000202707,0.05015365,0.0005235545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5637084,0.0001086657,0.4086121,0.0003065065,0.0001222574,0.000190354,0.000007938891,0.00002714921,0.02691659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98382,0.00007241355,0.01524814,0.0000445388,0.0004194682,0.000003336671,0.00001590957,0.00002170858,0.0003544774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4201116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3098558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04250689065343159,"score_gpt":0.2906611714301789,"score_spread":0.2481542807767473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}