{"id":"W2087406926","doi":"10.1139/f03-095","title":"The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":338,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Land cover; Environmental science; Marsh; Water quality; Amphibian; Land use; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001965288,0.0001827858,0.0001536421,0.0007884462,0.0004837566,0.0003486516,0.0001230901,0.0000999124,0.001220281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000919311,0.00009172629,0.0002411392,0.0003337487,0.0005402113,0.0002300536,0.0004620188,0.0001344162,0.00009466532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008976818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005752205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1692644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5096495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997635,0.00005158349,0.00001157259,0.00003636815,0.00007274328,0.00006421249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992669,0.0001498033,0.0002756513,0.00002958907,0.0001085332,0.0001695144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005288973,0.00002276767,0.9921151,0.00001452864,0.000043737,0.00006592536,0.0002032743,0.0001342623,0.002739564,0.00002955318,0.0000475462,0.00453074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.869609e-7,0.0000133681,0.9997463,7.643871e-7,0.000003968235,0.00001725765,0.00005903313,0.00006111652,0.00004696672,0.000006086202,0.00004408187,6.611555e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994985,0.00006852471,0.00006163095,0.000009122236,4.99674e-7,0.0000026084,0.00005942412,0.000002186261,0.0002974923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.00009238353,0.0001085805,0.000004711041,0.000001728262,0.000002975787,0.0001202902,9.177184e-7,0.0001922077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8307356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3365584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01871268104865241,"score_gpt":0.2058844327465938,"score_spread":0.1871717516979414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}