{"id":"W2087467701","doi":"10.1177/0149206304272185","title":"The Impact of Board Composition on Firms’ Critical Decisions: A Meta-Analytic Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Composition (language); Agency (philosophy); Meta-analysis; Principal–agent problem; Business; Accounting; On board; Psychology; Corporate governance; Sociology; Finance; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04360726,0.001193842,0.006499064,0.0100165,0.000505813,0.003029504,0.002387815,0.00135278,0.001989799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1549102,0.001107565,0.01059684,0.01124792,0.001185654,0.002124956,0.001361495,0.001249724,0.0002367978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00267412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005107486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005109275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01221646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9747473,0.01492366,0.005053159,0.001774019,0.003259425,0.0002424771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74291,0.2215997,0.0203058,0.004236442,0.0099593,0.0009886792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001919141,0.00009773364,0.03603671,0.4008519,0.3588572,0.0002829611,0.0007229104,0.001005609,0.0003703978,0.0007850988,0.002704449,0.1963659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006400883,0.000713627,0.04052474,0.1312544,0.8082365,0.0005648556,0.0005504342,0.0004755431,0.0008419092,0.001905546,0.01419708,0.00009523942],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005901197,0.9924558,0.0005927099,0.0003122402,0.00006490522,0.000090135,0.0002159073,0.000009370282,0.0003576938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1436483,0.8526961,0.002319692,0.0003922106,0.00013921,0.0002642603,0.0004269528,0.00001836366,0.00009500017],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04360726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1500354042428347,"score_gpt":0.3925210854644443,"score_spread":0.2424856812216095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}