{"id":"W2087488198","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.04.001","title":"Addressing efficiency: Economic evaluation and the agenda for CAM researchers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Economic evaluation; Strengths and weaknesses; Engineering ethics; Management science; Medicine; Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Social psychology; Law; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1750468,0.002993933,0.009949675,0.00621884,0.003054439,0.02067276,0.004839559,0.02482771,0.007933361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3654428,0.00139721,0.001929613,0.008025516,0.03929181,0.04065371,0.00847421,0.02018622,0.0007914837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01597955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006213644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00383031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8850155,0.09772191,0.003545776,0.002768956,0.008485054,0.002462838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3779307,0.5824515,0.009849497,0.00880001,0.01746646,0.00350183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002595031,0.0002363615,0.001251042,0.001664849,0.000308078,0.00007712946,0.000419882,0.005223227,0.0000529623,0.9243346,0.02201833,0.0441539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005582,0.00003026753,0.0002795055,0.0008751928,0.00004503283,0.00002538235,0.0003828966,0.003324725,0.00003892081,0.9871691,0.007690126,0.00003819073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004189411,0.1486021,0.05211708,0.7761499,0.003227147,0.0001262788,0.0001878642,0.00005293851,0.01534727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5278254,0.1910137,0.07689642,0.1569978,0.0381157,0.001615593,0.0002829179,0.0003109151,0.00694168],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8509962457632648,"score_gpt":0.653492575232066,"score_spread":0.1975036705311988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}