{"id":"W2087491399","doi":"10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503","title":"Post Hoc Power Analysis: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":461,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Post hoc; Post-hoc analysis; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Computer science; Power (physics); Statistics; Clinical trial; Econometrics; Medicine; Mathematics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08339836,0.0005746642,0.003364651,0.001231386,0.0009274926,0.0007812203,0.003201235,0.0001087772,0.06965462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191855,0.0002541026,0.002124736,0.001848772,0.0004337867,0.0009127996,0.00007187826,0.0006756393,0.0004240861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000397265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000105002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001599057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9699464,0.02000072,0.006244404,0.0006279727,0.002685321,0.000495133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866247,0.003260122,0.006489098,0.001383586,0.001783759,0.0004587366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003231821,0.001373974,0.01686521,0.000008602812,0.01602716,0.0001633921,0.01347435,0.0008260416,0.6566284,0.000219827,0.2586346,0.03254655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01032524,0.002295349,0.01391948,0.0000206502,0.00724961,0.0007273972,0.002652753,0.005281042,0.008488278,0.006036072,0.9419697,0.001034408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970603,0.01791225,0.0007536421,0.008891231,0.0005448202,0.0005598821,0.00001510039,0.00001209274,0.0007079774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739096,0.006831849,0.000174986,0.01278566,0.0006124778,0.00001261252,0.000005013859,0.0000387778,0.005629094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3816938802712875,"score_gpt":0.5115134620132727,"score_spread":0.1298195817419852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}