{"id":"W2087491399","doi":"10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503","title":"Post Hoc Power Analysis: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":461,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Post hoc; Post-hoc analysis; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Computer science; Power (physics); Statistics; Clinical trial; Econometrics; Medicine; Mathematics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4848855,0.002835599,0.004592484,0.004286893,0.00418813,0.01306107,0.006760161,0.0208981,0.009202472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7477825,0.00187013,0.004214769,0.004328737,0.0302725,0.04670893,0.006685751,0.03344626,0.002528374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007732863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01634435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002212083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7199185,0.2238403,0.02166723,0.008795672,0.02340505,0.002373292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2456135,0.6593318,0.02042626,0.02594294,0.0449615,0.003724082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001975251,0.0001626294,0.001920155,0.005215595,0.001297852,0.0006576412,0.00640185,0.002678752,0.000729593,0.6305555,0.08780764,0.2605975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001010617,0.0009005682,0.0008692943,0.005538956,0.0004810681,0.0004832735,0.001552306,0.004829708,0.0008713453,0.8665312,0.1166116,0.0003200748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002470305,0.02248013,0.3976232,0.5400804,0.03028773,0.001259433,0.000221934,0.0004035861,0.005173336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1223592,0.01991479,0.5670121,0.2272263,0.04127938,0.01416321,0.000264107,0.001261606,0.006519342],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5151145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6352279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3816938802712875,"score_gpt":0.5115134620132727,"score_spread":0.1298195817419852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}