{"id":"W2087549760","doi":"10.1080/02687038.2014.930262","title":"Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Aphasiology","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Aphasia; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Evidence-based practice; Systematic review; Pooling; Outcomes research; Meta-analysis; Research design; Stakeholder; MEDLINE; Management science; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3211988,0.002796704,0.01392255,0.02181832,0.002840798,0.01513062,0.00882734,0.01115981,0.00451528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4370637,0.003111796,0.01193596,0.02680287,0.01128398,0.02262312,0.009891295,0.01549491,0.001223032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02545775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07424942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01358577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02035994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8096578,0.1000877,0.05391341,0.009116993,0.02500946,0.002214611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2949522,0.6065304,0.03508841,0.0116513,0.04864906,0.003128698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003259958,0.00009574242,0.001139502,0.5082981,0.002083858,0.0001060871,0.00191684,0.0007287236,0.0002264431,0.02477044,0.01945919,0.4408491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286095,0.0001529876,0.001399727,0.8793181,0.002983768,0.0001813595,0.000964102,0.0004962282,0.0001475896,0.0193055,0.09482806,0.00009405128],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001072553,0.98387,0.001093931,0.01358711,0.0009683878,0.0001120987,0.00004837614,0.00001727914,0.0001955894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004672915,0.9782814,0.008303959,0.006814377,0.0009419328,0.0007685163,0.0001146393,0.00002761243,0.00007462825],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6788012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8370827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7958591996796028,"score_gpt":0.6813587313580888,"score_spread":0.1145004683215141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}