{"id":"W2087704110","doi":"10.1016/s0008-4182(05)80014-6","title":"Two cases of lacrimal gland agenesis in the same family — clinicoradiologic findings and management","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lacrimal gland; Agenesis; Anatomy; Medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007245623,0.002265031,0.001295349,0.00281511,0.004161823,0.001555374,0.001693489,0.005555781,0.002893059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008906583,0.00128607,0.001515821,0.001455083,0.00269442,0.00220406,0.001922642,0.002786482,0.0008174579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001049843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008316097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005851045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998687,0.0001649973,0.0001545913,0.0003337739,0.0001632603,0.0004964119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964253,0.001099503,0.0007884045,0.0003728246,0.0003414041,0.0009725316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000353513,0.0000988539,0.01445411,0.00001358202,0.000007128764,0.9830545,0.0005296998,0.0000549781,0.0003492428,0.0001827969,0.0001827845,0.001037126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891917,0.00009796326,0.01076527,0.000008863889,0.00001147918,0.9878408,0.0003813355,0.0001135894,0.0002192881,0.000131282,0.0003981746,0.00001295624],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825847,0.001953596,0.001752223,0.002359489,0.0003466227,0.0001969981,0.0002162307,0.00007324167,0.01051709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959344,0.0005526052,0.0009227234,0.0005691032,0.000534846,0.00004013081,0.00008565019,0.00002219281,0.001338364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008316097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0165354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05583643745569618,"score_gpt":0.329006335260369,"score_spread":0.2731698978046728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}