{"id":"W2087734379","doi":"10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.099","title":"A robust design approach to determination of tolerances of mechanical products","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CIRP Annals","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Product design; Reliability engineering; Product (mathematics); Functional requirement; Manufacturing cost; Engineering; Robustness (evolution); Design of experiments; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002300519,0.001578418,0.001767064,0.001233549,0.0003925212,0.001169764,0.001623564,0.001261192,0.002083901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00648304,0.00113717,0.001917292,0.0007607228,0.001175055,0.0008942637,0.001317165,0.001268232,0.0005564791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007297439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001011975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001855599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001337709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985095,0.0005072938,0.00007797265,0.0002706021,0.0005601405,0.00007449766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981624,0.001041133,0.0002478842,0.0001677183,0.0003465952,0.00003419446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594553,0.0000260814,0.00007717139,0.0001216799,0.00006443866,0.00004118391,0.00004170527,0.9284055,0.00715361,0.02308101,0.0004615692,0.04046015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008940736,0.0000714495,0.00004530917,0.000008906593,0.00001712565,0.00001397558,0.00000335855,0.9902146,0.00165173,0.007160142,0.0007943885,0.00001014753],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008221685,0.00006364272,0.9985688,0.00001974534,0.0000105501,0.000009261343,0.000009607908,0.00005666252,0.0004395934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2460575,0.0004915161,0.7495556,0.00008156236,0.0001449046,0.0002863617,0.0001522403,0.0002320886,0.002998117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002300519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01216644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0586900414190251,"score_gpt":0.2439176877410511,"score_spread":0.185227646322026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}