{"id":"W2087737072","doi":"10.1038/sj.jea.7500262","title":"Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: Elemental carbon (EC), PM2.5 mass, and absorbance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Absorbance; Mass concentration (chemistry); Aerodynamic diameter; Particulates; Environmental science; Air pollution; Environmental chemistry; Pollution; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Atmospheric sciences; Physics; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009863037,0.0003434596,0.0002305487,0.0009898923,0.0002048496,0.0005297233,0.0002998993,0.0005676305,0.0008264848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002255928,0.0002058429,0.0003228382,0.0006898959,0.0001953188,0.0003687464,0.0002317284,0.0003779455,0.0002416723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002171316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001605017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002298716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002880492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994243,0.0001729113,0.00003819042,0.0001163111,0.0001988449,0.00004940379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980551,0.000819005,0.0001813636,0.0000819132,0.0007442951,0.0001183188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01335621,0.0005871594,0.6012109,0.0003444519,0.0007990429,0.0001719966,0.0004351021,0.001429817,0.3311354,0.0002793964,0.0005562415,0.04969428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004586911,0.003447733,0.8332999,0.0000187249,0.0004835653,0.0005292115,0.0002569717,0.003458419,0.1569614,0.0001755068,0.001289464,0.00003316054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996914,0.0006037884,0.001294031,0.00001874001,0.00002042578,0.00000961359,0.0002158093,0.00002825101,0.0008952664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978054,0.0001650996,0.001097481,0.00002073753,0.00001389006,0.000009299923,0.0003509714,0.000008835761,0.0005282491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002298716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005216181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04378840649355977,"score_gpt":0.3334888133888628,"score_spread":0.2897004068953031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}