{"id":"W2087888521","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.008","title":"Application of the systematic review and bibliometric network analysis (SeBriNA) methodology contextualizes evidence. Part 2: rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Data extraction; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review; Grading (engineering); Citation; MEDLINE; Evidence-based medicine; Rituximab; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Lymphoma; Computer science; Library science; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07090866,0.001868443,0.008159065,0.06215196,0.001786608,0.00605316,0.00248697,0.001796444,0.008214937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3148293,0.00109618,0.01127878,0.05420902,0.001257625,0.005769446,0.00552701,0.001440673,0.0006769449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003898576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01673836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01477818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8491389,0.102165,0.03046588,0.004727661,0.01269513,0.0008074418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7048025,0.2542717,0.01984445,0.009005442,0.01155583,0.0005202423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004457839,0.00006331642,0.01082298,0.6391206,0.06775624,0.0002645465,0.002238011,0.00209267,0.0008684705,0.008689725,0.008611452,0.2590262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001077985,0.0005306514,0.03947409,0.4032346,0.3402237,0.000813555,0.00296784,0.007705064,0.001699904,0.04412855,0.1578027,0.0003414516],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02851522,0.8321847,0.06843983,0.008286884,0.001850994,0.02644815,0.02030593,0.0006827847,0.01328558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2958018,0.3786859,0.268936,0.001953017,0.0009492416,0.04118175,0.01007109,0.0002335466,0.002187663],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.937848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3750053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5681861577016148,"score_gpt":0.5815530398219163,"score_spread":0.01336688212030146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}