{"id":"W2088006907","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006","title":"How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Victoria","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Greenhouse gas; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Opportunity cost; Carbon offset; Marginal cost; Natural resource economics; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Economics; Ecology; Waste management; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03650029,0.003634149,0.006841872,0.004205859,0.0005519039,0.002751166,0.002599138,0.001893267,0.004158871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06591225,0.001715599,0.02410161,0.004046795,0.0009391534,0.002030125,0.001529384,0.003231193,0.0002636359],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003038394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002216605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01056881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01391075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847015,0.01206868,0.0007435883,0.001637888,0.0005267297,0.0003216265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9013757,0.08823022,0.003799686,0.004637769,0.001208559,0.0007480313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009330125,0.0001112969,0.02022822,0.01811899,0.8846666,0.0002138878,0.0001782942,0.03031065,0.0009131949,0.002450822,0.001330455,0.03214758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001640573,0.0005951994,0.01039921,0.002095851,0.9673188,0.000146334,0.0001033871,0.00754849,0.0006866113,0.006864581,0.002527768,0.00007316871],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.502156,0.4520842,0.0259667,0.00710685,0.001020136,0.0004638639,0.007331551,0.0004765997,0.003393981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966232,0.02204993,0.008977796,0.0007702095,0.0001577492,0.0001692881,0.00116891,0.000130912,0.0003431723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1930343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02115826171079651,"score_gpt":0.2452662813195273,"score_spread":0.2241080196087308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}