{"id":"W2088006907","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2004.05.006","title":"How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Victoria","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Greenhouse gas; Atmospheric carbon cycle; Opportunity cost; Carbon offset; Marginal cost; Natural resource economics; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Economics; Ecology; Waste management; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004929643,0.0003667382,0.0006859308,0.0006468449,0.0002454743,0.0001096634,0.001043379,0.00009299937,0.0007463302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006186014,0.0003065507,0.0006077952,0.00315043,0.002211937,0.0005197122,0.0007456942,0.0001362728,0.0001343102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001013579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004318511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01760869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001944382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996539,0.00005257933,0.0003666604,0.0007915435,0.001416884,0.0008333072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983945,0.00002340921,0.000370457,0.0008640955,0.000003811305,0.0003436536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007284211,0.001570176,0.7437327,0.00003118009,0.01454654,0.00006985797,0.005239442,0.1168111,0.1067458,0.008233986,0.0004246758,0.002521725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000987783,0.0003520449,0.9395694,0.000006525818,0.0304479,0.000009857841,0.000600397,0.004396162,0.01435272,0.002145842,0.005977561,0.001153826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713988,0.0001000936,0.000009304149,0.003558076,0.0000508974,0.0003696059,0.00004711263,0.00003857556,0.02442751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958743,0.00003412728,0.0002199291,0.0005745973,0.00005972793,0.00003808075,0.00001445492,0.00002269219,0.003162032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1958367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02115826171079651,"score_gpt":0.2452662813195273,"score_spread":0.2241080196087308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}