{"id":"W2088033508","doi":"10.3354/meps08667","title":"Modeling the spatial autocorrelation of pelagic fish abundance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Ecology Progress Series","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Swordfish; Fishery; Yellowfin tuna; Thunnus; Fishing; Geography; Oceanography; Miami; Tuna; Spatial analysis; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002907544,0.0001054864,0.0001376229,0.00002267089,0.0002018884,0.00003114562,0.0003652976,0.0001063268,0.01268831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008101694,0.00007739416,0.00003962406,0.000145695,0.0008420545,0.0002439335,0.0009016039,0.000367055,0.00004735991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002138977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002002877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008258864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008553631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990425,0.00005399771,0.0002144752,0.0002145329,0.0002040601,0.0002704776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995037,0.0000431029,0.00007074181,0.0003137756,0.00002524051,0.00004343248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006755618,0.00005161971,0.9614429,0.00001009997,0.000007999301,0.000004120672,0.0001479177,0.0004719994,0.00009333377,0.0004581416,0.0003116149,0.03693272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002881431,0.0002315974,0.8555312,0.000001324193,0.00001153749,0.00003747199,0.00007100034,0.1097958,0.0002336932,0.002532311,0.03110441,0.0001614718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512231,0.000001279319,0.00004288851,0.003301258,0.0003228938,0.0003888685,0.000002535957,0.00004003319,0.04467716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954349,0.00001146949,0.001208811,0.00008390601,0.0000739732,0.0001204881,0.00001484114,0.00001143279,0.003040211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1093238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008392183077649447,"score_gpt":0.2355844758544538,"score_spread":0.2271922927768044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}